Legal Opinion
Veneer v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 16, 1991No. 89-AB-1056; CA A62039Published
1Opinion of the Court
804 P.2d 1174 (1991)
105 Or. App. 198
Sun VENEER, Petitioner,
v.
EMPLOYMENT DIVISION and David R. Schafer, Respondents.
89-AB-1056; CA A62039.
Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.
Argued and Submitted June 11, 1990.
Resubmitted December 12, 1990.
Decided January 16, 1991.
Francis T. Barnwell, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jonathan T. Harnish, Kathryn M. Hindman and Bullard, Korshoj, Smith & Jernstedt, P.C., Portland.
Meg Reeves, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Employment Div. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.