Legal Opinion

Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1987No. 86-AB-1319; CA A41933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Employer petitions for review of EAB’s order allowing unemployment benefits to claimant. The referee found, in a decision which EAB adopted, that claimant voluntarily quit his job rather than submit to a drug test which employer required as part of a general policy proscribing the use of controlled substances by employes. The factual background is essentially identical to that in Glide Lumber Prod. Co. v. Emp. Div. (Smith), 86 Or App 669, 741 P2d 907 (1987). We held there that the claimant’s off-duty drug use, which resulted in his discharge after it was detected in a random drug test, was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Publishers Paper Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. Londahl v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Redman Homes, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Teamey v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API