Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
*235RICHARDSON, J.
The Employment Appeals Board held that claimant’s discharge was not for “misconduct connected with work,” ORS 657.176(2)(a); OAR 471-30-038(3), and that he is not disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. Employer seeks review, and we affirm.
Claimant began to work for employer in 1974. In 1987, he participated in a substance abuse treatment program provided by employer and entered into a “last chance” return to work contract with employer. Although the agreement does not say so expressly, its purpose was to prevent any controlled substance use by claimant, on the job or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Springfield Education Ass'n v. Springfield School District No. 19Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Veneer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Redman Homes, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dinkins v. Board of AccountancyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- American Moulding & Millwork v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- American Moulding & Millwork v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991