Legal Opinion

Smith v. Turner

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1965No. Civ. 27919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. *

Defendants appeal from judgment for plaintiffs in action for recovery of moneys paid by them for shares of stock in a California corporation named Sam Turner Mfg. Co., which payments were made under a preineorporation subscription agreement that preceded any steps toward incorporation. Defendants relied principally upon a plea of pari delicto which was rejected by the trial judge.

The purpose of the corporation was to finance the perfection and promotion of a patented machine or device for lifting and moving bed patients, an activity in which defendant Samuel A. Turner (frequently…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lawn v. Camino Heights, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Bradley v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Tarasi v. Pittsburgh National Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1978
  5. Golberg v. SanglierWashington Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API