Legal Opinion

Tarasi v. Pittsburgh National Bank

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County

Decided April 4, 1978No. G.D. 76-2605PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEKSELMAN, J.,

This case is now before the court on motions for summary judgment by defendant Neal Hageal, and by defendants S. Robert Mialki and Pittsburgh National Bank (PNB). Both motions seek judgment as to Count II of plaintiffs complaint on grounds of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel. Count II is a claim for damages based on fraud and deceit allegedly practiced upon plaintiff by defendants. Plaintiffs allegations were the basis of a previous action against Mialki and PNB for damages under section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of June 6,1934,48 Stat. 881,15 U.S.C.A. §78aet…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. John Hubicki v. Acf Industries, Incorporated, John Hubicki v. United Steelworkers of America and Acf Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. Neuman v. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Stevenson v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Allegheny Health Education v. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, LLPSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API