Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Garber

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1960No. Docket 13, Calendar 48,410PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

This is a suit for realtor’s commission claimed by plaintiff: under the “acceptance of offer” portion of a so-called “offer to purchase,” which defendants, as the property owners, had signed on June 22, 1957. The offer to purchase, previously drafted by defendant husband, an attorney, was executed on that same date by a husband and wife named LeBlanc as prospective purchasers. It contained paragraphs 2 and 3, which read as follows:

“2. As evidence of title, sellers will furnish purchasers as soon as .possible a complete abstract of title and tax history, certified to a date later than the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dykema v. Muskegon Piston Ring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. McPheeters v. BirkholzMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Horton v. ImmenMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Tyson v. HerrleMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Sieloff v. HubbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rick v. RLC CORP.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
  3. Fortner v. ConnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hayman Management Co. v. Dura Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API