Hayman Management Co. v. Dura Corp.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
Plaintiff, Hayman Management Co., is a real estate broker. Defendant, Dura Corporation, agreed that if Hayman obtained a purchaser for certain interests in real estate held by Dura it would pay Hayman a brokerage commission at the time of consummation. The agreement expressly provided that no commission would become due or payable if title did not pass "for any reason whatsoever”.
Hayman obtained a purchaser, and Dura and the purchaser entered into an agreement dated September 5, 1969 for the sale and purchase on January 15, 1970 of the property for $1,780,000. The transaction was never…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Beattie-Firth, Inc. v. ColebankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
- Todiss v. GarrutoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Hayes v. BeyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Craib v. Committee on National Missions of the Presbytery of Detroit of the United Presbyterian Church, U.S.A.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Rich v. Emerson-Dumont Distributing Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974