Legal Opinion

Hayman Management Co. v. Dura Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1973No. Docket 12691PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Plaintiff, Hayman Management Co., is a real estate broker. Defendant, Dura Corporation, agreed that if Hayman obtained a purchaser for certain interests in real estate held by Dura it would pay Hayman a brokerage commission at the time of consummation. The agreement expressly provided that no commission would become due or payable if title did not pass "for any reason whatsoever”.

Hayman obtained a purchaser, and Dura and the purchaser entered into an agreement dated September 5, 1969 for the sale and purchase on January 15, 1970 of the property for $1,780,000. The transaction was never…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ellsworth Dobbs, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Beattie-Firth, Inc. v. ColebankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Todiss v. GarrutoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. Hayes v. BeyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Craib v. Committee on National Missions of the Presbytery of Detroit of the United Presbyterian Church, U.S.A.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Rich v. Emerson-Dumont Distributing Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API