McPheeters v. Birkholz
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Defendants A. W. Birkholz, his wife Maria, and their son Arthur N., owned 380 acres of farm land, on which were buildings, stock, implements and tools. Part of the land was owned by the son, part by the wife and part by the husband and wife. They advertised for a tenant. Plaintiff, a young married man, an agriculturist, taught and trained, lived in Minnesota. He answered the advertisement. He met the Birkholz men. A lease on shares was prepared and signed by the three men on June 16, 1917. Plaintiff learned later of the interest of Mrs. Birkholz. The writing contained an undertaking to sell…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Randall v. ChubbMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Lewis v. SheldonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Hanaw v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Hough v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Wray-Austin Machinery Co. v. FlowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Robinson v. WeitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Hersey Gravel Co. v. Crescent Gravel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Cunningham v. GarberMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- In Re Petition of State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- United Coin Meter Co. v. LasalaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.