Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Whited

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 14, 1969No. 53818PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Commissioner.

The principal issue is whether the trial court erred in granting defendants a new trial for the giving of Instruction No. 2 for plaintiff:

“Your verdict must be for plaintiff against defendants if you believe:
“First, defendants either:

failed to operate their vehicle in compliance with the rules of the road, and to have the same under control at all times, or

drove on the wrong side of the road, and

“second, defendants’ conduct, in any one or more of the respects submitted in paragraph First, was negligent, and
“Third, as a direct result of such negligence, Homer Eugene…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Artstein Ex Rel. Artstein v. Pallo Ex Rel. PalloSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. Evans v. ColomboSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Miles v. GaddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  4. Coit v. BentzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. Myers v. MoffettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hicks v. Graves Truck Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Fields v. BerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Havel v. DieblerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Turner v. CowartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Lucky v. Avon Products, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API