Schuman v. Kobets
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
The claimants in this case filed a complaint that largely recited tort, but wrapped the claim in contract language in hopes of using the six-year statute of limitation applicable to contract actions. The trial court was right to dismiss the tort claims as tardy, but there may bé some remaining viable contract claim.
Linda Schuman rented an apartment from Ernest and Susan Kobets from 1989 to 1993 under an oral month-to-month lease. In June 1990, pigeons began roosting in a broken window casing and in the wall of Schuman’s apartment. Despite repeated requests, the Kobets…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Noblesville Redevelopment Commmission v. Noblesville Associates Ltd. PartnershipIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Whitehouse v. QuinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Schuman v. KobetsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sunman v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by19 opinions
- Loomis v. Ameritech Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Eskew v. CornettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Midwestern Indemnity Co. v. LaikinDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
- Crossroads Service Center, Inc. v. ColeyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Anthony B. Lewis v. Methodist Hospital, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.