Sunman v. Clark
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Ripley Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.
The complaint in this cause avers that on and from the first day of October, 1884, to the 30th day of May, 1885, the plaintiff, at the special instance and request of the defendant, cut timber, hauled logs and lumber, sawed logs into lumber, planed lumber, and loaded cars for the defendant, a bill of particulars of which is filed with the complaint and made part thereof; that said labor and services were worth $1,200, which is due and unpaid.
A demurrer to this complaint was overruled, and the appellant excepted. The appellant then filed his answer, in three paragraphs. The first is a general…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Carter v. Aetna Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
- Schuman v. KobetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Simons v. WittmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
- Hubert v. JoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Burbidge v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921