Loomis v. Ameritech Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTINGLY-MAY, Judge.
Arthur E. Loomis, III, ("Arthur") and Linda D. Loomis (collectively, the "Loom-ises") appeal the trial court's grant of motions for judgment on the pleadings in favor of Ameritech Corp. ("Ameritech") and Attorney John McCrum ("MeCrum") and the law firm of Eichhorn & Eichhorn ("Eichhorn") (collectively "the Attorneys"). The Loomises raise two issues for our review, which we restate as: 1) whether the trial court erred by not expanding the tort of intentional interference with civil litigation by spoliation of evidence to include the spoliation of testimonial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Abbott v. BatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Olcott International & Co. v. Micro Data Base Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bennett v. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonoughUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Watson v. Auto Advisors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Allen v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- J.S. Sweet Company, Incorporated v. Sika Chemical Corporation, Also Known as Sika CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.