Legal Opinion

Schuman v. Kobets

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1998No. 49A02-9704-CV-256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellants-Plaintiffs Linda K. Schuman (“Daughter”) and Rachel Stuckey (“Mother”) appeal the judgment on the pleadings entered against them in their lawsuit to recover their damages related to Daughter’s histo-plasmosis infection contracted from the apartment rented from Appellees-Defen-dants Ernest M. and Susan G. Kobets (“Landlord”). We affirm.

Issues

Daughter raises two issues relative to her claim. Restated, they are:

I. Whether the two-year statute of limitations applicable to actions for personal injuries applies even though the complaint states an action…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wehling v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Malachowski v. Bank One, IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. PokrakaIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Midwestern Indemnity Co. v. LaikinDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  2. Schuman v. KobetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Forte v. Connerwood Healthcare, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Spolnik v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  5. Lewis v. Methodist Hospital, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API