Legal Opinion
Richman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 20, 1977No. 76 Civ. 3301 (CHT)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (“Merrill Lynch”) has moved for various forms of pretrial relief in this action alleging sex discrimination in employment under 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). The Court is asked to dismiss plaintiff’s claims in whole or in part or, failing that, to order a venue change. Because the Court has determined that venue properly lies in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, 1 it will leave to the transferee court the matters of dismissal or striking of claims pursuant to Rules…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Emmett J. Stebbins v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Nationwide Mutual Iinsurance Company, Emmett J. Stebbins v. Keystone Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- McCrystal v. Barnwell Cty., South CarolinaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Dubnick v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1973
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Parish Water Work's Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
3Cited by7 opinions
- Allen v. IsaacDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Ayala-Branch v. Tad Telecom, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Templeton v. Veterans AdministrationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Matthews v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Spencer v. Department of Human ResourcesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.