Legal Opinion
Allen v. Isaac
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 2, 1983No. 81 C 911PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge.
This is a class action brought on behalf of black bank examiners employed nationwide by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) alleging that the FDIC utilizes discriminatory training and promotion procedures. The primary allegation of the one count amended complaint is that the Progress Evaluation Examination (“PE”), ostensibly a prerequisite to promotion from a grade GG-9 assistant bank examiner to a grade GG-11 commissioned examiner, is “wholly subjective” and neither standardized nor validated as allegedly required by…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Riordan v. BarneyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1986
- Haywood v. BarnesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1986
- Walco Investments, Inc. v. ThenenDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
- Franklin v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- Shores v. First City Bank Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.