Satink v. Holland Tp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
This case is a sequel to the case of Satink v. Holland Township et al., D.C., 28 F.Supp. 67, in which plaintiff, a resident of New York, and a passenger in an automobile, complained that the defendants, New Jersey governmental corporations, maintained a nuisance in that a highway was not flush with an intersecting railroad track, existence of which caused plaintiff as she negotiated the intersection to be thrown with great force forwards and upwards to her injury. Defendants therein moved for the addition of the owner and driver of the automobile in which plaintiff was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crim v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939
- Satink v. Holland Tp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1939
- Jensen v. Bank Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Burns Bros. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Elliott v. Armour & Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1939
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bedel v. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984
- Sussan v. StrasserDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- People of State of Illinois v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Delano v. IvesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- Atlantic Coast Line R. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.