Legal Opinion

Satink v. Holland Tp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 9, 1939No. 208PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a resident of New York, alleges that defendants, residents of New Jersey, either jointly or severally constructed and maintained a highway which traversed an existing railroad track operated and maintained by the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company at a point existing on a downhill grade, and that the downhill rail of the track was elevated one inch above its parallel rail by virtue of a curve in the track at the point of intersection. Plaintiff complains of the fact that the level of the highway was constructed and maintained one inch below the downhill rail of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allas v. Borough of RumsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Kravas v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Crim v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939
  4. Hammond v. County of MonmouthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  5. Bossard v. McGwinnDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. Atlantic States Gas Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Fahey v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. Morrell v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  4. Malkin v. Arundel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1941
  5. Gray v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API