Legal Opinion
Jensen v. Bank Line, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 14, 1928No. 5352PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
Concerning the. condition of the shaekle pin and the strain under which it broke, all the testimony on behalf of the appellant, with the exception of that of one expert, was heard before the court. There was evidence that the pin had been subjected to extraordinary strain in dragging a heavy slingload of lumber, estimated by the first officer of the ship to weigh 2% tons, a distance of 180 feet across the dock. An expert witness, who had been employed in the repair department of the Emergency Eleet Corporation, testified that in his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. RequenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Coughlin v. The RheolaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
- The ProvidenceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1923
- Neptune Steam Nav. Co. v. BorkmannCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ramirez v. Toko Kaiun K.K.District Court, N.D. California · 1974
- Crim v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939
- Walter Filipek v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc., and Third Party and Eastern Rigging Corp., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Atlantic Coast Line R. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1943
- Satink v. Holland Tp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.