Legal Opinion
Crim v. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 3, 1939No. 90549PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUHRING, Justice.
The declaration is in two counts and was filed on the 6th day of September, 1938,' and prior to the effective date of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts of the United States, rule 86, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.
It appears in each count of the declaration that the defendant corporation entered into a liability insurance agreement with one Frederic C. Newburgh, whereby it agreed that if any third person sustained injury or any property was damaged as a result of the operation of a certain Ford automobile either by said Frederic C. New-burgh or any…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schneider v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Myers v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Pollock v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
- Jensen v. Bank Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Eames v. MayoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. JollimoreDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
- Crum v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1939
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. District Court in & for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Satink v. Holland Tp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1939
- Atlantic Coast Line R. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1943
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.