Legal Opinion

Barker v. St. Louis County

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 21, 1937PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause is in ejectment to recover land (private property) taken by St. Louis County for a public road. The trial court sustained defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings and plaintiff appealed. [1] It is contended that ejectment is not the proper remedy. Plaintiff's case is based solely on the theory that the proceedings resulting in taking his property without just compensation are utterly void. If so, ejectment is a proper remedy. [Tebbs et al. v. Platte County, 325 Mo. 304,28 S.W.2d 656.]

The constitutionality of that part of Section 7840, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. Stat. Ann.,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Kincaid v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. State Ex Rel. May Department Stores Co. v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Moore v. Ready Mixed Concrete CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Myrick v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. In Re Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1973

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API