Legal Opinion
Tidal Oil Co. v. Flanagan
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 7, 1924No. 179PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
263 U.S. 444 (1924)
TIDAL OIL COMPANY ET AL.
v.
FLANAGAN.
No. 179.
Supreme Court of United States.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 19, 1923.
Decided January 7, 1924.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA.
Mr. Edward H. Chandler and Mr. William O. Beall, for defendant in error, in support of the motion. Mr. Summers Hardy and Mr. Thomas J. Hanlon were also on the brief.
Mr. Preston C. West, Mr. Alexander A. Davidson, Mr. Wallace C. Franklin and Mr. Arthur J. Biddison, for plaintiffs in error, in opposition to the motion. Mr. Y.P. Broome was also on the brief.
2Opinion of the Court · TaftChief Justice Taft
J.P. Flanagan…
3Cases cited52 opinions
- Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by107 opinions
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.