Legal Opinion

Jewell v. Schmidt

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1957PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The three issues presented on this appeal are: (1) Was Jewell entitled to the benefit of the emergency doctrine so as to absolve him of all causal negligence as a matter of law ?(2) If the foregoing question is answered in the negative, did Martha Jewell assume the risk of her husband’s causal negligence as a matter of law ?(3) Was there sufficient proof established of a contract entered into between Martha Jewell and the clinic and hospital whereby she agreed to pay the unpaid balance of her medical and hospital bills, as will permit her to recover the amount of such unpaid bills from her…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Clark v. McCarthyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hoehne v. MittelstadtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Klas v. FenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Havens v. HavensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bronk v. MijalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Puhl v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Stromsted v. St. Michael Hospital of Franciscan SistersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API