Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1972No. 25PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, C. J.

The issue presented to the lower court and on this appeal is whether a husband’s claim for damages for loss of consortium and for medical expenses is barred by the statutory limitation of $25,000 in secs. 81.15 and 895.43 (2), Stats., because his wife’s claim for her damages has exhausted that amount. The trial court held the husband’s claim was a separate and distinct cause of action and carried its own statutory limit of $25,000 and thus a husband could recover the stipulated $8,000 damages.

The issue of whether the statutory limit of $25,000 in secs. 81.15 and 895.43 (2), Stats., covers…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Moran v. Quality Aluminum Casting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Fitzgerald v. Meissner & Hicks, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Callies v. Reliance Laundry Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Wangen v. Ford Motor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Stanhope v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bartholomew v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund & Compcare Health Services InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Lambert v. WrenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gutter v. SeamandelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API