Legal Opinion

Bronk v. Mijal

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1957PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The issues raised on this appeal are as follow,s :(1) Is there any evidence to support the finding that the defendant Sylvester Mijal was negligent as to lookout?(2) Was the negligent speed of Sylvester Mijal such an overpowering factor in causing the accident as to prevent any failure of lookout on his part from being a proximate cause of the accident ?(3) If Sylvester Mijal was causally negligent as to lookout, did the plaintiff Kenneth Bronk assume such negligence as a matter of law?(4) Are the defendants entitled to a new trial because of the failure of the trial court to submit a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wells v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Young v. Nunn, Bush & Weldon Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Frey v. DickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. McNamer v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Oldenburg v. O'BrienWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jewell v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Blashaski v. Classified Risk Ins. Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Kornetzke v. Calumet CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Stotzheim v. DjosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Tomchek v. Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API