Clark v. McCarthy
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 10, 1933:
Wickhem, J.
The first contention of the defendant is that there is no evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict that defendant was negligent. In the view the court takes of this case, this is the only contention that requires treatment in this opinion.
The plaintiff and Bolton were rendered unconscious, and neither their testimony nor that of Tremain went much further than the assertion that the Bolton car was on its right side of the highway. Bolton testified that he did not see the car of the defendant McCarthy before the collision. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Accident Insurance Co. v. RunquistWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- West v. DayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Rubach v. PrahlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Ortmann v. A. Leath & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jewell v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Marjorie Lambie v. Leroy Tibbits and Herman Mutual Insurance Company, and Clinton Avery and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- DeKeyser v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- MacKowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.