Legal Opinion
United States v. George Schaeffer, Jr., and Elsie Schaeffer, His Wife
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1963No. 18291_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
Appellant brought this action to recover construction and maintenance costs, enforce covenants running with the land, and foreclose liens, pursuant to repayment contracts executed by the appellees or their predecessors in title, in connection with the Lummi Diking Project constructed by the Government pursuant to the Act of March 18, 1926, 44 Stat. 211. 1 The district court entered summary judgment for the appellees, based upon facts admitted in a pretrial order, holding that there was a “fatal want of equity as to the case of the plaintiff, and in particular that any…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- United States v. Butterworth Judson Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Stewart v. Griffith Ex Rel. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Fischler v. NicklinWashington Supreme Court · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- J.B.C. Lockwood, Jr., Successor to Sanford M. Sage, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Emerald Properties, Inc. v. The Wolf Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Sapolin Paints, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.