Legal Opinion

Fischler v. Nicklin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1958No. 34172PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing both appellants’ first cause of action against the respondents for $7,855.41 upon a written contract, and the second cause of action for $600 paid by the appellants at the request of the respondents.

In August of 1953, respondent Jack Nicklin, by conditional sales contract, sold a tavern, or beer parlor, known as “The Hub,” which he operated on leased premises in Toppenish, to Patricia H. Fulp, and subleased the premises to her.

Six months later, on February 3, 1954, when the balance due on the purchase price was $10,855, payable $250 monthly,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Croton Chemical Corp. v. Birkenwald, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Superior Portland Cement, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Shore Investment Co. v. Hotel Trinidad, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1947
  4. John Soley & Sons, Inc. v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Hein v. FoxMontana Supreme Court · 1953

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gail Michelman v. Lincoln National Life InsurancCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Cornish College of the Arts v. 1000 Virginia Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Skagway City School Board v. DavisAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Jones Associates, Inc. v. Eastside Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API