Legal Opinion

In Re Sapolin Paints, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 6, 1980No. 1-19-40561PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CECELIA H. GOETZ, Bankruptcy-Judge:

Sapolin Paints, Inc. (“Sapolin”) and Wool-sey Marine Industries, Inc. (“Woolsey”), debtors and debtors-in-possession, jointly applied for an order pursuant to § 365 of the Bankruptcy Code (11 U.S.C. § 365), authorizing the assumption and assignment of six leases. Arthur Gilbert, the owner of a building at 2750 South Garfield Avenue, Los Angeles, California, which is the subject of one of these leases (the “California Leasehold”), is objecting to such assumption and assignment.

THE BACKGROUND

Sapolin filed a petition for an order of relief under Chapter…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Kuehner v. Irving Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Smith v. Hoboken Railroad, Warehouse & Steamship Connecting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Finn v. MeighanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Richmond Leasing Co. v. Capital Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Triangle Laboratories, Inc. v. HalvajianCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. In Re By-Rite Distributing, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
  4. Edward McAndrews as Trustee of Iyanough Realty Trust v. Fleet Bank of Massachusetts, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. John Cinicola v. William J. Scharffenberger, Chapter 11 Trustee, Et Al.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API