Daggs v. Howard Sheep Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District of the Territory of Arizona, in and for the County of Coconino. Edward M. Doe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
The appellee, Howard Sheep Company, commenced this action to establish its rights to the waters flowing in Spring Valley Wash at flood seasons, and impounded by it in Howard Lake and appropriated to use in stock-raising, and for the purpose of restraining the appellant, J. F. Daggs, from diverting such flood waters from plaintiff’s ditch used by plaintiff for conveying such waters from the said wash to said lake. The defendant demurred to the complaint, assigning a number of grounds for demurrer, among which he specifies that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carmack v. ErdenbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
- Svea Insurance v. McFarlandArizona Supreme Court · 1900
- Gill v. RodgersTexas Supreme Court · 1873
- White v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1892
- Walker v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by14 opinions
- Leeker v. LeekerArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Brasher v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Gibson v. McLaneArizona Supreme Court · 1915
- Hammels v. KreigArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- Protest of SweeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.