Protest of Sweeney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
At the outset of this appeal by a taxpayer from an adverse decision of the Court of Tax Review we are confronted with an objection to the consideration of the purported appeal on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction because no proper notice of appeal was given within the time provided by section 6 of Initiative Bill No. 100, section 12310, O S. 1931, 68 Okla. St. Ann. sec. 336. That section provides that appeals may be taken from the decision of the Court of Tax Review by either the protestant or the county if the party desiring to appeal "shall, within ten days after the filing of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daggs v. Howard Sheep Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Cannon v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Damaras v. DanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Hammels v. KreigArizona Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. Green Country Softball Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- O'BALLIET v. LillardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Modern Builders, Inc. v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Brown v. Green Country Softball Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994