Legal Opinion

Hammels v. Kreig

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1925No. Civil No. 2362PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— Vinton Hammels; hereinafter called plaintiff, entered suit against Alvina and Michael Kreig, hereinafter called defendants, to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract. Plaintiff had leased from defendants a certain tract of land for the purpose of growing cotton thereon, and defendants had agreed to furnish and keep in repair a certain pumping plant to supply water for said ]and. The complaint alleged that defendants had failed to furnish and maintain said pumping plant in repair, and that by reason thereof plaintiff could not secure sufficient water to properly grow cotton on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. BoyceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Daggs v. Howard Sheep Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Dominguez v. MascottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Ellis v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Gibson v. McLaneArizona Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chiricahua Ranches Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. HorwathArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Protest of SweeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. S. H. Kress & Co. v. EvansArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Sweeney v. Tulsa County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API