Legal Opinion

Walker v. Blake

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1910No. Civil No. 1132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for Maricopa County. Edward Kent, Judge.

1Per curiam

Appellees move for an affirmance of judgment in this case for the reason that no motion for a new trial was filed within the time provided by law, and that there is no assignment of error. The motion for a new trial was filed more than five days after the judgment was rendered. Therefore the trial court did not err in denying it. *2The failure to move for a new trial waived all errors not fundamental. McDonald v. Cox, 12 Ariz. 171. 100 Pac. 457.

Counsel for appellants do not make a formal assignment of errors, but close their brief with the statement that the trial court erred in several…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daggs v. Howard Sheep Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API