Legal Opinion

Gibson v. McLane

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1915No. Civil No. 1389PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Gila. G. W. Shute, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This is an action for brokerage commissions. Appellee, as administrator, has been substituted for the plaintiff E. C. MeCamey, who has deceased since the appeal. The appellants A. H. and B. F. Gibson were the defendants. The cause of action is set forth in two counts — one on contract and one on quantum meruit. At the close of evidence on motion of defendants, the plaintiff elected to go to the jury on the count on contract. The contract, as pleaded, briefly is: That the plaintiff was a broker engaged in the business of buying and selling cattle; that defendants employed him on or about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. BoyceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Daggs v. Howard Sheep Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Dominguez v. MascottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Mahoney v. CapertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Fountain Water Co. v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sadler v. Arizona Flour Mills Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Chiricahua Ranches Co. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Kendrick v. HealyWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Miller v. George F. Cook Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Ellis v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API