Legal Opinion
State v. Soto-Nunez
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 28, 2007No. C021718CR, C022939CR A121304 (Control) A121305PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals judgments of conviction in two consolidated cases. He advances various arguments that his sentences were unlawful. We conclude that one of those arguments is well taken with respect to the sentences in one of the cases and requires that we vacate the sentences in that case and remand for resentencing.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. In case A121304 (Washington County case number C021718CR), defendant was convicted of one count of felony driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) and one count of giving false information to a police officer. In case A121305…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. BucholzOregon Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. Van NguyenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. OpitzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.