Legal Opinion

State v. Hammond

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 19, 2008No. 04CR0437; A131374PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*576HASELTON, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment revoking his probation. He first assigns error to the trial court’s reliance on the results of a polygraph examination to determine that he had violated a condition of probation. Defendant also contends that the trial court erred in ordering that he not be considered for alternative sanctions under ORS 137.752(1) without articulating, on the record in open court, the reasons for that order. We conclude that the trial court did not err in considering the polygraph examination results and that defendant did not preserve for our review his claim of error…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. ArdizzoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. S.-Q. K. (In re S.-Q. K.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  4. Diorec v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
  5. State v. TildenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API