State v. Pierce
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.
Defendant appeals her judgment of conviction and sentence. She assigns error to the trial court’s determination that she cannot be considered for certain programs under ORS 137.750. In particular, defendant contends that the trial court’s determination is erroneous because the court did not find on the record that there were “substantial and compelling reasons” to deny her consideration for such programming. Defendant acknowledges that her claim of error is not preserved, but argues that she should be excused from the requirements of preservation. Specifically, she contends that she was not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. IvieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. Soto-NunezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. BasketteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. BergerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017