Legal Opinion

Rasmussen v. Apple Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 14, 2014No. C-13-4923 EMCPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docket No. 22)

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Corbin Rasmussen brings the instant action alleging that Apple’s 27-inch *1030iMac computers suffer from a defect which causes the screen to “dim” permanently, affecting the usefulness of the computer. Plaintiff asserts two causes of action on behalf of a proposed class consisting of all individuals who have purchased a 27-inch iMac — a California ^Legal Remedies Act claim, Cal. Civ.Code § 1750, and a California Unfair Competition Law claim, Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code § 17200,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Belfiore v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  3. Opperman v. Path, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. McCoy v. Nestle USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Beyer v. Symantec Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API