Legal Opinion

Opperman v. Path, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 23, 2015No. Case No. 13-cv-00453-JSTPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Re: ECF Nos. 493, 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 503

THIS ORDER RELATES TO ALL CASES

JON S. TIGAR, District Judge

Before the Court are nine motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“SCAC”) filed by Defendants Twitter, Inc.; Foodspotting, Inc. and Yelp! Inc.; Foursquare Labs, Inc.; Chillingo Ltd., Electronic Arts Inc., Rovio Mobile Oy, and ZeptoLab UK Limited; Gowalla Incorporated; Instagram, LLC; Kik Interactive, Inc.; Apple Inc.; and Path, Inc. ECF Nos. 493, 495, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 503. For the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Beck v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
  3. Yastrab v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  4. In re Facebook Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. La Park La Brea A LLC v. Airbnb, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API