Opperman v. Path, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS
Re: ECF Nos. 493, 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 503
THIS ORDER RELATES TO ALL CASES
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge
Before the Court are nine motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“SCAC”) filed by Defendants Twitter, Inc.; Foodspotting, Inc. and Yelp! Inc.; Foursquare Labs, Inc.; Chillingo Ltd., Electronic Arts Inc., Rovio Mobile Oy, and ZeptoLab UK Limited; Gowalla Incorporated; Instagram, LLC; Kik Interactive, Inc.; Apple Inc.; and Path, Inc. ECF Nos. 493, 495, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 503. For the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Beck v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Yastrab v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- In re Facebook Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- La Park La Brea A LLC v. Airbnb, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.