Legal Opinion
Gant v. Reilly
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 11, 2002No. Civ.A. 02-858(RBW)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WALTON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Pet.”) that was filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), seeking review of the United States Parole Commission’s (“U.S. Commission”) decision to revoke the petitioner’s parole. The petitioner alleges that: (1) this Court should entertain his petition because he is not required to ex haust the habeas remedies available to him in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (“Superior Court”) because only a United States District Court has authority to exercise…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ash v. ReillyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Ramsey v. ReillyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Carter v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Hill v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Jefferson v. GainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003