Legal Opinion

Carter v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 6, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2008-1749Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA George E. Carter, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08-1749 (JDB) District of Columbia et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this action brought under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and the Federal Tort Claims Act,

28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, sues the District of Columbia Department of Corrections and the United States Parole Commission. He alleges that defendants violated the Constitution’s ex post facto clause by “failing to execute the ‘old’ parole laws and regulations for the D.C. Municipal Regulations” at his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robert Franklin v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Gant v. ReillyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API