Legal Opinion
Ash v. Reilly
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 25, 2007No. Civil Action 03-2007 (RMU)(AK)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ALAN KAY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is the Petitioner’s Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [5] brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and 2243, the Respondent’s Opposition [8] and the Petitioner’s Reply [9] and the Respondent’s Response to the Petitioner’s Reply [11]. The Petitioner is challenging his present detention on the basis that his rights were violated at an August 13, 2003 parole revocation hearing at which time his parole was revoked and his current sentence of 102 months was imposed.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The Petitioner, Wilbur Ash 1 is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. RondeauCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Commonwealth v. WilcoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- State v. Abd-RahmaanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Ash, Wilbur v. Reilly, Edward F.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- State v. Abd-RahmaanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.