Legal Opinion
Ramsey v. Reilly
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 4, 2009No. Civil Action 07-0433 (PLF)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
James Ramsey brought this action for a writ of coram nobis or, in the alternative, for a writ of habeas corpus to challenge the issuance of a parole violator warrant and the subsequent extension of his full term sentence. Petitioner, who currently is on parole supervision in the District of Columbia, asserts that the issuance of the warrant and his subsequent treatment on parole violated his due process rights. After careful consideration of 'the parties’ papers and the relevant case law, the Court will deny the petition and will dismiss the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Blair-Bey v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Goings v. Court Services & Offender Supervision AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Ramsey v. FaustDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Munn-Bey v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States v. StewartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Goings v. Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.