Legal Opinion

Hill v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 2, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-1476Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ARNOLD J. HILL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-1476 (JEB) UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Having spent the last thirty years locked up for strangling an ex-girlfriend, Plaintiff Arnold Hill is eager to get out. In bringing this action, he asserts that the U.S. Parole Commission has unfairly blocked his release in a number of ways, including by failing to give him notice about testimony from the victim’s family, treating him (a District of Columbia offender) differently from federal prisoners,…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API