Legal Opinion

Wollman v. Geren

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided March 17, 2009No. 1:08cv1130 (JCC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint by Defendant Pete Geren, sued in his official capacity as Secretary of the Army (“Defendant”). For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion to dismiss.

I. Background

Plaintiff James Wollman (“Plaintiff’), an Army officer who was discharged without pay because of a physical disability that the Army determined was “Existing Prior to Service,” brought this suit to seek review of the Army’s decision that its Discharge Review Board lacks…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Versata Development Corp. v. ReaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
  2. Wollman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  3. National Council for Adoption v. JewellDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  4. Mashni v. US Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API