Legal Opinion
Wollman v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 6, 2013No. 12-125CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
10 U.S.C. § 1201 (2006) and 37 U.S.C. § 204(a)(2006); Military Disability Retirement; Existed Prior to Service, “EPTS”; Presumption of Incurrence and Aggravation; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(2), Remand.
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
In this military pay case, Mr. James H. Wollman (“Mr. Wollman” or “the plaintiff’) seeks compensation and benefits under 10 U.S.C. § 1201 (2006) and 37 U.S.C. § 204(a) (2006) stemming from the Army Physical Disability Review Board’s (“APDRB”)1 failure to correct what he alleges was the United States Army Physical Disability Agency’s (“USAPDA”) (1) denial of a full and fair…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Barna v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Latham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Prewitt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.