Legal Opinion
Versata Development Corp. v. Rea
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 7, 2013No. Case No. 1:13-cv-328 (GBL/IDD)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GERALD BRUCE LEE, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Teresa Stanek Rea’s and Intervenors SAP America, Inc. and SAP AG’s Motions to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Docs. 16, 39.) This case concerns the claims of Versata Development Group, Inc., by virtue of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), through its Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”), wrongly instituted post-grant review of Plaintiffs claimed patent based on an improper interpretation of the America…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Cooper v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Synopsys, Inc. v. MatalDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Versata Development Group, Inc. v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.