Hanlin v. Ohio Builders and Remodelers, Inc.

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment against , Defendant Ohio Builders and Remodelers, Inc. (Doc. # 72) and against Defendant Equicredit (Doc. # 85); as well as Defendant Equicre-dit’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 78). For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs’ motion against Defendant OBR is granted by virtue of OBR’s default; Plaintiffs motion against Defendant Equicredit is denied in part; and Defendant Equicre-dit’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I

Plaintiffs Martin…