Legal Opinion

Delawder v. Platinum Financial Services Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 1, 2005No. C-1-04-680PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

DLOTT, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure To State a Claim and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (doc. # 10). 1 Defendants in this case are Platinum Financial Services Corp. (“Platinum Financial ”), law firm Javitch, Block and Rathbone (“JB & R”), and Nena Pav-lovic (“Pavlovic”), an attorney at JB & R (collectively, “Defendants”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.

I.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wendelyn Harvey v. Great Seneca Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  3. Gionis v. Javitch, Block & Rathbone, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Bradshaw v. Hilco Receivables, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  5. Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API