Legal Opinion

Masten v. Amco Insurance Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 2011No. 49A02-1009-CT-998PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Chief Judge.

Case Summary and Issue

Kerwin and Heather Masten (collectively “Plaintiffs”) appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to AMCO Insurance Company (“AMCO”). Plaintiffs raise one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court erred in concluding as a matter of law that no underin-sured motorist coverage is available to Plaintiffs. Concluding that the trial court erred and coverage is available, we reverse and remand.

Facts and Procedural History 1

In 2006, Kerwin was driving in Indianapolis behind Herbert Allison, Jr. Allison stopped abruptly and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. American States Insurance Co. v. KigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Tate v. Secura InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. United National Insurance v. DePrizioIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Bradshaw v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Stevenson v. Hamilton Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ohio Farmers Insurance Company and S.C. Nestel, Inc. v. Indiana Drywall & Acoustics, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Peabody Energy Corp. v. RoarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Bachman v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012
  4. Dawson v. Fifth Third BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SellersDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API