Legal Opinion
Tate v. Secura Insurance
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1992No. 49S02-9202-CV-135PublishedCited by 163 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant Thomas Tate seeks transfer to this Court following the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming summary judgment for Secura Insurance, A Mutual Company, the defendant-appel-lee, as to the interpretation to be given an automobile insurance policy providing underinsured motorists coverage. Tate v. Secura Insurance (1990), Ind.App., 561 N.E.2d 814.
Tate was seriously injured as he was providing assistance to a car stalled in the parking lane of an Indianapolis street when it was struck by a vehicle operated by an intoxicated driver. Tate settled with the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Miller v. DiltsIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Falcon Insurance Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. EvistonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Powers v. CALVERT FIRE INS. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by163 opinions
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Beam v. Wausau Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
- USA Life One Insurance v. NuckollsIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Flanders Electric Motor Service, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Bosecker v. Westfield InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
158 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.